ramadamaramadam

$2.2M · 30-day displayed profit

Reconstruction error for all 25 wallets this cycle is published in full in the reconstruction workpaper.

September 20, 2026 clarification. The record shows no clear trading pattern that supports a classification. The 62.9% and 81.54% figures are different dated calculations.

Historical July rationale: 63% reconstruction on a fill log our own engine flags truncated — the shortfall may be ours, and no dominant tell separates it. The gap is unreconciled.

The book won’t reconcile from public data, so we don’t guess. That refusal is the product. Our verbatim rationale for this wallet is on file in the reconstruction workpaper, next to the errors on the wallets we did score.

Corrected 2026-07-25. Re-fetching this wallet with the corrected pipeline measured 81.54% of displayed — an under-reconstruction — and a blind second implementation, run without access to ours, measured 81.25%. The 62.9% above was our data gap, not the wallet’s: it came from the fetch that silently omitted maker-side fills, the same failure we retracted in the endpoint case. The corrected figure still lands outside the ±15% band, so the verdict does not move, and the July 2026 cycle stays frozen on the fetch that produced it — the correction is published beside the original, not adopted. Source: scorecard-refetch-2026-07-25.json; the dated correction is on the Scorecard.

11,588 fills · 67 markets · avg buy $0.533 · top market: Will Spain win on 2026-07-10?