The top of the leaderboard is mostly bots you can't copy.

Every leaderboard and copy-trading tool ranks wallets by profit. But profit doesn't tell a copier the one thing that decides whether they'll make money: is this edge reproducible, or is it a bot doing something you structurally cannot?

Correction, added 2026-07-16 — the arithmetic on this receipt. Every dollar amount here is shares × price, rounded half-up to the dollar; each line is now checked against that rule by tools/audit.mjs and the build fails if one drifts. Two were wrong when this page went up. The largest fill printed $125,950 where 126,195 × 0.9980 is $125,942.61 — $7.39 high, and reachable by no rounding model, while its two sibling lines rounded correctly to the dollar. The USA line printed $2,849 where 2,864 × 0.9950 is $2,849.68, which truncates to 2,849 but rounds to 2,850 — so the block was using two different rules at once. The subtotal line is not an error and is left alone: 151,227 × 0.9975 appears to miss by $7.07, but 0.9975 is a 4-decimal display of 150,856/151,227 = 0.99754673, and a 4dp average carries enough slack ($7.56 across this size) to cover it — the product is the wrong relationship to check, the quotient is the right one. (Superseded in part 2026-07-18, next paragraph: the "$125,943" and "$2,850" this pass produced were themselves not sourced to anything — see below.)

Correction, added 2026-07-18 — sourced against a committed artifact, and two totals move again. The 2026-07-16 pass checked that each line was internally consistent; it had no transaction data to check the lines against, because none had been kept. A 2026-07-18 per-market re-fetch (both markets, paged to a clean under-cap finish; every fill behind all five lines, hashed, is now committed at debased-receipts.json) supplies that missing check, using usdcSize — the exact on-chain USDC amount per fill, the field this site's other reconstructions treat as authoritative — as the dollar figure for each line. Two lines' sourced totals are not what shares × displayed price gives. The largest Portugal fill is one on-chain transaction whose usdcSize is $125,949.86, which rounds to $125,950 — $7 above the $125,943 this page printed after the 2026-07-16 pass, and exactly the figure this page printed before it. The USA line is eight separate transactions in a 3-second window totaling $2,849.38 — $0.62 below the $2,850 the 2026-07-16 pass printed, and (at the dollar) exactly the pre-2026-07-16 figure. The two lines fail the product check for different reasons, both evidenced in the artifact: the Portugal fill's own usdcSize does not equal its displayed price times its displayed share count (a 3-decimal display price is not the exact multiplicand), while the USA line's eight legs all price at exactly 0.995 and its 2026-07-16 figure came from multiplying a share count that had been rounded up (2,864 × 0.995 = $2,849.68 → $2,850; the true count is 2,863.7). Both lines now print in the same avg/quotient format the subtotal line already used — the USA line at full precision, so its printed pair reproduces the artifact's sums exactly. The fresh, hashed artifact says the two originals — typed 2026-07-11, before anyone checked either relationship — were the numbers that tied to the ledger, and the arithmetic-only pass moved them away from it while making them look more rigorous. The 8,609- and 2,804-share lines are untouched: their usdcSize matches shares × price exactly, so the product format still ties them without adjustment.

What this receipt is sourced to, and what it still isn't. The wallet's full address is 0x24c8cf69a0e0a17eee21f69d29752bfa32e823e1 — independently look-up-able, matched against three files in the decode engine that agree on it. The fills behind all five lines above are the committed, hashed artifact linked in the correction directly above, not a hand-typed 2026-07-11 pull with nothing kept. Unchanged: debased's exact net PnL is still not decision-grade — at 444 markets / 74K fills / heavy merges, reconstruction needs deeper accounting than a five-line receipt attempts — and the strategy classification still rests on the prices and sizes shown, not on these dollar totals. The card’s summary stats above the receipt (74,345 fills · 444 markets · 65% / 67% / $0.78) are not sourced to that artifact: the fills count disagrees with the engine’s own saved output by 757 (ours high, ~1%) — logged as U4 in the same table, magnitude and direction only. Logged as RECONCILED in the unreconciled-items table, U3.

We pulled the fill history for each of the next five — 14,000 to 469,000 fills apiece — and ran the same classification debased got. The story holds: the biggest names are market-makers, arbitrageurs, and lottery players whose edge is structure or variance, not calls a retail account could follow.