Archived: missing data undermined MSR’s wallet rankings

This study is archived and its wallet rankings are withdrawn. MSR’s original July 11, 2026 report treated incomplete trading histories as complete. The clearest failure was swisstony: the report listed roughly 14,000 fills, while a more extensive July 16 retrieval found 2,918,281. This page retains the failure record, dated corrections and a few checkable purchase receipts. It does not restore the ranking. Withdrawal and correction history

A feed returns records under its retrieval limits. Reaching those limits does not establish that the account stopped trading there. A wallet-wide ranking needs the relevant history; a valid receipt proves only the purchase it records. Those distinctions explain why narrow evidence can survive while the broader study remains withdrawn.

The retrieval limits made a partial history look like a lifetime count

The feed capped results at roughly 3,400 rows per wallet and 3,500 per time window. MSR’s initial pull did not subdivide busy windows enough to clear those limits. The roughly 14,000 swisstony fills were only about 0.48% of the later retrieval, which found more than 200 times as many. The omission arose in MSR’s retrieval, rather than in an established explanation about the wallet’s trading. History and retrieval limits

The later process paged time windows until each finished below the cap. It did not independently check the 2,918,281 fills against the activity endpoint. The larger count therefore shows the original omission without certifying a complete lifetime history. Other wallets were not all remeasured and lacked the artifacts needed for revalidation. Repairing one count could not validate the rest of the ranking.

The retained receipts establish specific purchases

Five retained purchase lines for the wallet labeled debased document football shares bought close to $1. In a four-minute Portugal window on July 6, the aggregate recorded 151,227 No shares for about $150,856 across 21 fills priced at least 99 cents. The three largest displayed fills are included in that aggregate and must not be added again. In the U.S. team’s market on July 7, eight fills bought 2,863.7 No shares for $2,849.38. Retained purchase artifact

Those receipts establish purchases at particular prices. They do not establish profit after all sales, payouts and other positions. The earlier wallet-wide summary was unsupported, and its fill count differed from saved engine output by 757. The withdrawn summary cannot supply the missing accounting for these receipts.

A hypothetical contract bought for 99 cents earns one cent before costs if it pays $1 and loses 99 cents if it pays nothing. Buying near $1 therefore does not establish safety or repeatability. The retained purchase price also does not show that the outcome was already final or that another trader could obtain the same terms.

Earlier “real edge,” “artifact” and bot classifications were withdrawn conclusions. The separately reconstructed myzbsq football position has its own evidence and does not validate them. The historical table remains a record of superseded claims, rather than a current comparison of traders.

The correction history leaves the broader ranking withdrawn

The July 11 study was pulled that day. July 16 checks exposed the swisstony omission and prompted receipt-arithmetic work. By July 18, the purchase artifact had been corrected. An August 14 revision narrowed the headline and use of “complete”; later clarifications separated observed purchases from strategy claims. Dated corrections

The surviving value is a traceable account of the retrieval failure and the narrower facts supported by retained records. The archived status is part of the finding. A corrected purchase receipt cannot turn the superseded wallet-wide ranking into current research.