Four ways to put the same forensic evidence to work — two available to scope today, two under evaluation. Every engagement is backward-looking research on public data: classification, not advice, and never a recommendation to route or copy a trade. Availability, delivery, and permitted downstream use are reviewed case by case and may depend on data rights, required permissions, and legal review.
Available to scope · one-off
Forensic Wallet Audit
A decision-grade memo on one wallet or a cohort: the verdict, the evidence-confidence gate, a fill-by-fill mechanism breakdown, and a methodology appendix — written to be checked: method, evidence grade, and limitations stated in the memo itself. Strictly backward-looking: mechanism, data-completeness, and replicability constraints. No sizing, no allocation call.
Research, risk & platform-diligence teams evaluating wallet claims
Scoped per request · single wallet or cohortFixed scope, scheduled delivery slot. Request scope & pricing below.
Available to scope · recurring
Monitoring Feed pays more on a negative flip
Standing alerts on a watchlist — verdict changes, data-completeness failures, and concentration warnings — delivered to Slack, email, or a webhook. Built so a risk or compliance team can prove it surfaced a flip. Verdict-neutral by construction: an unfavorable finding is worth more to you, and to us.
Risk & compliance teams · platforms with listing or integrity duties
Recurring, annual termTeam and enterprise tiers scoped on the call.
Under evaluation
Copyability API
We are evaluating machine-readable access to MSR verdicts — mechanism, evidence status, and verdict as a structured endpoint. Negative and “insufficient” verdicts would render identically and could not be suppressed — the neutrality would be enforced in the contract, not just the copy. Tell us the intended use.
Terminals, leaderboards & data tools
Under evaluation · not currently offeredNo self-serve product, commercial data license, or redistribution right is offered on this page. No copy-execution licensees.
Under evaluation
Institutional Dataset
Structured historical and prospective verdicts — including the append-only, prices-frozen Copyability Ledger; among the tools we inspected, we found nothing else like it. Every checkpoint is permanent and citable. We are evaluating structured access for internal research — tell us the intended use.
Researchers, quants & market infrastructure
Cite the public data freeStructured access under evaluation. No self-serve product, commercial data license, or redistribution right is offered on this page.
When a wallet ranking becomes an input to a research, platform, or risk decision, a leaderboard number is not enough: it collapses mechanism, evidence quality, and follower timing into one PnL figure. MSR Decode separates those questions — and publishes the failures as visibly as the passes.